By Elbert Ventura
Dir. Jason Reitman, U.S., Fox Searchlight
In a recent Atlantic Monthly essay, Michael Hirschorn sniffed at the prevailing sensibility in indie-hipster culture. âWeâre drowning in quirk,â Hirschorn wrote, worrying that the ethos had made virtues of insularity and weightlessness. The diagnosis was astute, even if the net was cast too wide. (Lump in Arrested Development and The Royal Tenenbaums with Napoleon Dynamite and Garden State? I donât think so.) Hirschorn called quirk the âembrace of the odd against the blandly mainstream,â but that definition doesnât quite get at the problem. For itâs not the embrace of odd that he was railing against, itâs the dumbing-down of it. In the movies, contemporary quirk has become less about opposing the mainstream but being accepted by it. The quirk-mongers of Indiewood, the worst offenders of them all, have drained the words âeccentricâ and âweirdâ of all meaning. They have accomplished what mainstream culture normally does: they have banalized the marginal and the offbeat.
Enter Jason Reitmanâs Juno. It arrives in theaters with a formidable aura of buzz and inevitability. Telluride and Toronto screenings played to enthusiastic crowds. Critics and journalists have been whipping out their thesauri to find new ways to say âedgy,â âhip,â and, yes, âquirky.â The sell job has been impressive: an interview with Ellen Page on Pitchfork, word-of-mouth screenings in select cities, and the sudden ubiquity of Diablo Cody, the former stripper-turned-blogger-turned-bestsellerâtalk about a publicistâs dream bioânow tipped as a shoo-in for an Oscar nomination for screenplay. But lest we be distracted from the movieâs merits by its hype, letâs state for the record: Juno is occasionally funny, rarely intelligent, and often annoying. A crowd-pleaser for people who like to think theyâre above crowd-pleasers but are actually not, itâs going to be huge.
The movie drowns you in quirk from the get-go. A 16-year-old girl (Page) takes swigs from a jug of Sunny Delight as she recounts for the audience how she came to her desperate pass: she has just found out sheâs pregnant. Sealing the diagnosis with one final pregnancy test (âYour eggoâs prego,â says Rainn Wilsonâs convenience store clerk), she decides to get an abortion. But on the way, she encounters a pro-life classmate protesting outside the clinic who says that her fetus probably has fingernails already. (As a bonus, the classmate is Asian and speaks grammatically incorrect English. Hilarious!) Between that appeal and the dingy waiting room, Juno makes her decision: sheâs keeping the baby and will give it up for adoption.
The choice is received with convenient equanimity by her loving dad (J.K. Simmons) and stepmom (Alison Janney)âlittle more than mascots here. No less passive is Paul (Michael Cera), her best friend and the guy who knocked her up during a bored hook-up. The only tension comes from Junoâs relationship with the adoptive parents whom she finds in a Penny Saver ad, a handsome yuppie couple who live in a McMansion at âGlacial Valley Estates.â In a satiric knock that has all the bite of a Bush joke, Mike (Jason Bateman) is a sellout with a Peter Pan complex while Vanessa (Jennifer Garner) is an uptight career woman who just wants to be a mother. How American suburbia will survive this withering critique, I donât know.
These scenes transpire featuring dialogue whose primary objective is to remind us of Diablo Codyâs peerless taste and knack for reparteeâor preening overwriting, as it so happens. Coming back from a distressing night with Mike and Vanessa, Juno is greeted by dad with, âYouâre looking a little morose.â That âmoroseâ is an eye-rollerâwhatâs wrong with âsadâ or âdepressedâ or âbummedâ? (It reminds me of Kingsley Amisâs criticism of his son Martinâs prose: âI think you need more sentences like âHe put down his drink, got up, and left the room.ââ) In the next breath, the words âskankyâ and skeevyâ tumble out of dadâs mouth, drawing laughs from a crowd conditioned to guffaw at the sight of a grandma cursing or a kid flipping the bird. Though bearing a superficial resemblance to Enid from Ghost World (Cody actually used that screenplay as a guide for hers), Juno never evolves into a recognizable human being. Page is actually fine in the role, but thereâs littleâor perhaps too muchâto work with here. With every line working overtime to be a kewl bon mot, much of it less clever and funny than Cody thinks it is, Juno remains nothing more than an authorial mouthpiece that not even the late (and inevitable) stab at pathos can flesh out.
Compounding matters is Reitman. His debut, the kinda-sorta funny Thank You for Smoking, was smug, polished, and broad as a barn. He brings the same palette and technique to Juno, painting in loud colors and big strokes, never once trusting the audience to find the joke for themselves. Reitman and Cody seem to think that all it takes to deepen a character is to hand out eccentricities like party favors. For Paul, letâs have a Tic-Tac habit; for the stepmom, how about an obsession with puppies? Then thereâs the (literally) running joke of the high school track team, in their burgundy tank tops and golden short shorts, entering and exiting the frame whenever a cheap laugh is called for. If the dialogue is sub-Tarantino, the deadpan strangeness is sub-Wes Anderson. The only respite comes from the actors. Page can sometimes turn an overworked line into a genuine zinger. Cera comes off even better, going to the well one more time with the endearingly awkward shtick he honed to perfection on Arrested Development. (The question has to be asked: does Cera have something else to give us? His Internet show, âClark and Michael,â hinted yes, so letâs hope so.) Meanwhile, Bateman and Garner try to rescue Mike and Vanessa from clichĂ© purgatory, and at times even succeed.
Hanging over it all and left oddly unspoken is the question of the movieâs abortion politics. Unlike the decision in Knocked Up, which is portrayed as a personal choice with little elaboration, Junoâs about-face on abortion is framed explicitly as a moral choice. Her encounter with the pro-life protester is validated when, explaining her decision to have the baby to her friend, Juno says that the fetus already has fingernails. The film tries to deflate this notion, stressing the creepiness of the waiting room and playing up the protestorâs lameness. But one canât ignore whatâs shown: a pro-lifer telling a pregnant teenager that her fetus is a life, that rather than abort she should carry it to term and give it up for adoption, and the teen, after some thought, doing exactly that. Itâs no wonder the movie has been well-received on pro-life blogs and chat boards.
Cody, in an interview with the Guardian, stressed her own pro-choice views and said of the abortion clinic scene, âI didn't want it to seem as if she left because she suddenly had some moral epiphany. It was more that she left for really human, teenage reasons. She's freaked out.â To be clear, what matters here isnât whether Cody is pro-life or pro-choice. And obviously, this is not about the morality of Juno keeping her baby (the movie wouldnât exist otherwise). What matters is how Cody frames that decisionâand whether she understands the link between text and subtext. In her defense of the scene, she inadvertently points up whatâs fundamentally wrong about Juno and the culture of quirk. Playing everything for effect, Cody and Reitman excuse themselves from addressingâor even thinking aboutâknottier issues of meaning and politics. Play everything for laughs, make sure itâs weird but not too weird, and send the audience home on a reassuring high. As long as itâs funny, as long as itâs cool, as long as it âworksââthatâs the Sundance bottom-line. Is Juno this yearâs Little Miss Sunshine? You bet.