Tsai
Ming-liang Symposium
Introduction
Interview
with
Tsai Ming-liang
-Goodbye
Dragon Inn
-Andrew Tracy
-Nick Pinkerton
-Rebels of the Neon God
-The Hole
-The River
-The Skywalk is Gone
-Vive L'Amour
-What Time Is It There?
-A Whiff of Reality
New
York Film Festival
-Saraband
-Tarnation
-The Holy Girl
-Tropical Malady
-In The Battlefields
-The World
-Or
-Undertow
-Bad Education
-The Big Red One...
-Notre Musique
-Café Lumière
-Keane
-Moolaadé
-Sideways
-Vera Drake
-Infernal Affairs
New
Releases
-Closer
-Alfie
-Birth
-The Assassination
of
Richard Nixon
-The Grudge
-The Machinist
RS on indieWIRE
updated weekly
issue archive
mailing list
advertising
contact us
links
about us
|
 |
 |
    |
|
Space
Odyssey
Nicolas Rapold on Vive L'Amour
With Vive L'Amour,
the films of Tsai Ming-liang became stories of space
as much as of people: the siamese flats joined together
in The Hole, the anonymous steam rooms of The
River, the amniotically lit family apartment of
What Time Is It There?, the movie theater and
hallways of Goodbye Dragon Inn. Compared to these
later works, the orbits of Rebels of the Neon God
are less constrained, the terrain more incidental, and
even the globetrotting What Time Is It There?
is threaded tight with a telephonic-chronographic linkup.
The nexus of Vive L'Amour is an uninhabited duplex,
and the realtor's term feels appropriate given the professions
of two of the main characters: one a realtor named May
Lin (Yang Kuei-mei), and the other a broker for the
equally crowded after-life, Hsiao-kang (Lee Kang-sheng
as employee of a columbarium concern). Both are products
of the obsession with square footage that seizes a rapidly
developing island metropolis. The third is a street
seller of imports, Ah-jung (Chen Chao-jung), who migrates
between Taiwan and the mainland and is also split as
the object of attention for both the other characters.
Critics frequently describe Tsai as a poet of urban
loneliness, a limiting stereotype originating in the
eager plotting of a line traced by the recognizable
aimless teenagers in Rebels and the empty real estate
of Vive. Yet no one would use The River's
wrenching text to extract a lesson about urban living,
and both Goodbye Dragon Inn and Tsai's upcoming
project, which involves both musical interludes and
a porn acting, confirm the dangers of packaging Tsai.
The description belies a reflexive discomfort with the
private moment and ignores the spatially integrated
structure for various human relationships that the director
constructs and calibrates. It's not so much that the
people in a Tsai film are alone or unable to connect
as that their relationships are mediated, oblique, constrained
by space-a space that Tsai is constantly adjusting.
Fittingly, a key hanging in a look opens Vive,
filmed with sensual clarity in a startling close-up
that leaves Hsiao-kang a blur in the background. In
swiping the key, Hsiao-kang indulges the playful fantasy
some of us have when passing an empty vacation home
or Manhattan pied-à-terre, but this apartment is an
even blanker plane of projection, unsold and unlived
in. It is a free space to let psychosexual fantasy roam,
space as pure potential, and the transgressions, better
phrased in this social vacuum as expressions, are many:
cross-dressing, a street pick-up, a suicide attempt,
even the less exotic playing with food and the rather
more recherché cross-dressed calisthenics. Squatting
in an apartment between renters, Hsiao-kang and Ah-jung
effectively live in the interstices of other people's
lives, a precarious status somewhere between public
and private as May Lin comes and goes during her day
of showings. One morning Hsiao-kang putters about before
realizing (in a silent-movie freeze take) that May Lin
is downstairs eating noodles, and Tsai connects the
two with a mischievously inquisitive tilt-pan from the
balcony up. And so Hsiao-kang and Ah-jung inhabit the
negative space of others (and initially each other's),
in a liminal passing-through space akin to Goodbye's
movie house or the enabling steam rooms of The River.
In this roundabout world, it takes the two young men's
mutual avoidance of May Lin for them to strike up an
acquaintance, after a Duck Soup-like bumping
of noses, naturally produced by the farcical setup as
they sneak out. They have met once before, but Ah-jung's
attempt then to play the bullying guard doesn't stick,
for in this no-man's-land, Hsiao-kang senses tacitly
and undramatically that Ah-jung's authority is not only
faked but inconsequential.
|
| |
|
Ah-jung's attempt to
master space is doomed, and one senses that something
about Tsai's technique of framing demands this failure.
Part of Tsai's repertoire is the infamous medium close-ups,
often head-on, but an equally crucial portion is comprised
of a spectrum from medium to long shots through which
Tsai alternatingly frames the expanse of a whole room,
threads through doorways and hallways, or contains two
characters seated alone-together. The camera takes its
cues as much from the space as from the character, a
jarring approach in the motivation-driven grammar of
conventional narrative. His strategy is less described
as following motivation than as capturing a character
against a projected context, particularly a spare screen-like
locale-he creates, in other words, an intimate psychological
dialectic between framing and character behavior. Individually,
people tuck themselves/are tucked into spaces: Hsiao-kang
or Ah-jung in a bedroom shot through the slit of a doorway,
or May Lin crouching in the corner of the frame to make
a phone call in a loft. The expanses of these interior
shots can eloquently draw out a character's approach
to and comfort within the world, akin to the democratic
capacity for idiosyncrasy Tati recognized in his more
heavily populated panoramas.
The dialectic becomes electric in a two shot such as
the confrontation between Hsiao-kang and Ah-jung. Standing
outside the bedroom, Ah-jung looks to be making his
empty scolds to an empty doorway, but Tsai holds the
shot and the space, the background unusually bare and
lighting indistinct. Into this flattened composition,
emerging in every sense, Hsiao-kang, shyly, with an
imperceptible step, materializes, unable to remain absorbed
by the background. Tsai develops the shot later by reversing
the inquiring gaze, when Hsiao-kang and Ah-jung have
dinner together, with Hsiao-kang's satisfaction expressed
in his furtive look at the oblivious Ah-jung: Tsai's
camera circles the table, the pot sizzling along with
Hsiao-Kang's tension, and the shifting parallactic relations
render subtle adjustments of subjectivity that recall
Hou Hsou-hsien.
Tsai can and does turn exterior spaces into shifting
psychological landscapes of framing and being framed.
In a flirtatious counterpoint to Hsiao Kang's yearning
away in the background, Tsai presents the street side
hide-and-seek of the initial Ah-jung/May Lin courtship,
and the choreography of both their blocking and the
camerawork around columns and storefronts even bears
a faint musical ring. But the outdoor climax of Vive
occurs with May Lin's exodus the morning after a hungry
recoupling with Hsiao-kang (and some car trouble). Tsai
opens the sequence with another psychologically fraught
shot of emergence: into an urban tableau of a construction
site and skyscrapers, May Lin worms her way into visibility
from a street deep in the background, a bracing but
gradual journey into the light of consciousness. The
most shocking part of the whole sequence is arguably
not May Lin's six-minute crying jag but the liberation
of the tracking shots and endless pan that follow, lose,
and recapture her in the park-the pan a reprise of the
180-degree-rule-breaking pan that just precedes Antoine
run on the beach in The 400 Blows.
|
| |
|
May Lin's scene of emergence
is a take that seems longer than it is, partly because
we don't usually see a shot beginning that “early” in
the character's progress across the screen, particularly
in depth as opposed to laterally. And it is easy to
forget such instructive little confusions of the first
viewing, because they remind how deeply intertwined
spatial relations are with narrative expectations-and
how Tsai does not flout but rather approaches obliquely
these and other expectations in configuring his spaces.
As Vive switches between character trajectories, Tsai
often sidesteps continuity expectations in ways that
reflect the spatial-psychological integration of the
characters. One easy example lies in the frequent disorientation
of the apartment space, a space seemingly resistant
to familiarity, like the toggling viewpoints on Playtime's
glass building that only exchange equivalent confusions.
Significantly, the disorientation arises especially
as Hsiao-kang and Ah-jung are vying for the same unfamiliar
territory, boxing with shadows. Another tension arises
from Tsai's ambiguous opening shots, anchored in the
corner of the room or from outside a doorway, which
can resemble establishing shots; sometimes his trick
is to linger but cut away (and other times they actually
remain the principal view). When May Lin upends her
purse at the door of the apartment while looking for
the missing key, for example, Tsai cuts to a shot of
the empty apartment, playing on a continuity expectation
that May Lin did find the key and is about to enter.
Instead, the next shot is a surprising close-up of Hsiao-kang's
bandaged hand. Likewise, scenes of May Lin at her apartment
showings are shot at a tense middle distance that Tsai
sometimes does, sometimes does not relieve; he seems
unwilling to divorce the character from the landscape
of the bare walls.
Indeed, the dynamic between character and space finds
its thematic cousins in the Tsai movements between dualities:
the mundane and the fraught, solitude and loneliness.
Which actually brings us to Tsai's better-known, dominant
mode of framing: the single-character studies, often
shot head-on and boxed-in, the character absorbed in
a highly private behavior. The relation between space
and character in these closer-shot studies remains as
intertwined as other modes, for they are at once personal
and leveling, right near the character's surface and
yet a reminder of the impassable depth of private experience.
The leveling can be profoundly unsettling: Tsai confronts
us so suddenly with Hsiao-kang sitting alone on a bed,
trying to cut his wrists, as if the removed-but-present
medium close-up finally affords the nowhere space needed
for such self-nullification, away from the anxiety-ridden
world of human interaction. Outside of another movement
to the eternal (prayer), one cannot imagine a more private
experience than suicide, and Tsai trumps himself by
then interrupting with Ah-jung and May Lin arriving
for sex: union and isolation, newly neighbors.
|
| |
|
Ironically, far from
an exercise in miserabilism, the leveling enrolls the
extraordinary scene, filmed like others at a slight
tilt, in what might be called a community of solitary
experiences-a gallery of living portraits: May Lin bleary
in the morning, Ah-jung settling in for a wank, Hsiao-kang
making out with a melon. Tsai's behavioral eye takes
them all in, with a respectful distance that avoids
either wallowing in or clinicizing his subjects. And
Tsai is unafraid to rework the distance by deflating
the air of absorption, as witnessed in May Lin's superb
mosquito hunt scene. Hsiao-kang's close-up shows May
Lin's face deep in some form of concentration, and it
seems we could not get closer to her thoughts-when her
quick clap at the bug reveals the mundane origin of
her trance. Through her subsequent dance with an invisible
enemy-the artistic apotheosis of the comedian's riff
on what a man dodging a bee looks like from across the
street-the behavior becomes almost a representation
of a resistance to interpretation and access, another
moving figure in a bare landscape. And in her heightened
awareness, she joins the community of Tsai characters
who are constantly listening, usually to their fellow
human beings through the walls, the congenial paranoia
of an unseen neighbor's sonic presence in their heads.
This community of solitary beings poke about the spaces
of Tsaiville, driven by secret needs and not-so-secret
ones like desire. And viewed through Tsai's eye for
behavior, the mute, uncensored, unself-conscious actions
of the characters of Vive L'Amour and others
can have the air of animals under benign observation,
our fellow beasts. There is something about the quiet
respect, untainted by a fetishizing sentimentalized
affection, with which Tsai approaches his creations
that makes the human animal label stick: people in all
their habits and behaviors and expressed desires-and,
above all, in their spaces. For these are spaces as
solitary beasts might use them-a usage bestially sensible
and safe, like the absent owl who takes up in a disused
attic, or the squirrel with a nest in a car on blocks.
They are spaces as ever-shifting homes, in the organic
animal mode more than the razing human: spaces with
new purposes, that shape as much as they are shaped,
brought into being under Tsai's patient eye. |
|
|