Tsai
Ming-liang Symposium
Introduction
Interview
with
Tsai Ming-liang
-Goodbye
Dragon Inn
-Andrew Tracy
-Nick Pinkerton
-Rebels of the Neon God
-The Hole
-The River
-The Skywalk is Gone
-Vive L'Amour
-What Time Is It There?
-A Whiff of Reality
New
York Film Festival
-Saraband
-Tarnation
-The Holy Girl
-Tropical Malady
-In The Battlefields
-The World
-Or
-Undertow
-Bad Education
-The Big Red One...
-Notre Musique
-Café Lumière
-Keane
-Moolaadé
-Sideways
-Vera Drake
-Infernal Affairs
New
Releases
-Closer
-Alfie
-Birth
-The Assassination
of
Richard Nixon
-The Grudge
-The Machinist
RS on indieWIRE
updated weekly
issue archive
mailing list
advertising
contact us
links
about us
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Good
Men, Good Women
Michael Joshua Rowin on Saraband
Dir. Ingmar Bergman, Sweden, Sony Pictures Classics
The early Seventies
was a terrific time for European art cinema directors
to explore dysfunctional relationships. Fassbinder,
of course, cornered the market in that tenuous subgenre
with The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant, which
quickly followed his breakthrough The Merchant of
Four Seasons, a similarly aching study of cruel
partnerships. '72, the year that saw the release of
those films, also featured Maurice Pialat's We Will
Not Grow Old Together, in which a Pialat surrogate
and his mistress go through an agonizing cycle of break-up
and reconciliation over the course of 110 minutes (not
surprisingly, Fassbinder must have found the film pertinent,
for he featured parts of it in a sequence from In
a Year of Thirteen Moons). Even Godard, at the peak
of his Maoist phase, placed a troubled relationship
at the heart of his dialectical-materialist Tout
va bien. Was something in the air? Perhaps due to
the receding turbulence of late-Sixties/early-Seventies
European political and social upheaval, and the disillusionment
left in its wake, artists looked in other directions,
confronting romantic crises that related to a different
sort of universal and personal malaise.
Then, in 1973, came the mother lode: none other than
Ingmar Bergman brought to television Scenes from
a Marriage, a six-part, five-hour series chronicling
the disintegration of a bourgeois couple's love (a two-and-a-half-hour
film version was also released). Scenes was the
highpoint of Bergman's Seventies work, captivating audiences
with its devastatingly realistic fights, evasions, passive-aggressions,
and acts of mutual destruction. It also found the director,
after a period of visual and dramatic experimentation,
returning with conviction to the economy and precision
that marked his masterpieces of the late Fifties and
early Sixties. Subtle shifts in camera distance and
framing reinforced the slow unraveling of Johan (Erland
Josephson) and Marianne's (Liv Ullmann) marriage. Likewise,
Josephson and Ullmann represented the apex of onscreen
emotional vulnerability-their performances feel so lived-in,
so much inseparable from their very physical existences
that the characters nearly leapt off the screen with
desperation and urgency.
This might be why Bergman has chosen to end (presumably)
his unparalleled cinematic career by returning to Johan
and Marianne . . . sort of. Those going into Saraband
expecting a sequel to Scenes from a Marriage
might be baffled, but such a warning is testament to
Bergman's ability to still surprise and challenge audiences
after all these years. Saraband does indeed begin
with the couple: Marianne speaks into the camera, updating
the audience on the last 30 years of her life and Johan's.
The two never did reunite after Scenes' hopeful,
ambiguous ending-Marianne stayed on in divorce law,
while Johan inherited a fortune and settled down at
the family retreat in rural Sweden. Neither have had
much contact with their two daughters, and have not
even spoken to each other for many years. Marianne decides
to pay Johan a visit at his retreat.
The film's first ten minutes are disconcertingly awkward:
while Bergman mastered the art of direct address during
the peak of his career, Marianne's speech to the camera-at
a table covered with photos, from which she shows us
the ones relevant to the story-never transcends its
contrived expositional function. When Marianne walks
through Johan's maroon-painted house, leading the camera
along to surprise her ex-husband, the muted, playful
tone feels off, contrasting harshly with the mysterious
slamming doors and the solemn tune Marianne plucks on
the piano-hardly the ominous or melancholy intro Bergman
might have intended. Only when Marianne and Johan begin
talking to each other does Bergman recover his handle
on the film. Nobody's better at capturing the natural
rhythms and cadences of conversation, traversing the
profound and the mundane with such ease and unself-consciousness.
At the same time, nobody's better at throwing an audience
for a loop with a well-placed existential zinger: “My
life has been shit,” Johan sighs, with a frightening
air of acceptance along with regret.
|
| |
|
After this first section
(of ten in total, structured as “sarabands,” or dances
meant for two partners), Bergman changes gears, introducing
an entirely different familial dynamic. Johan's sulking,
pathetic son Henrik (Borje Ahlstedt), from his first
marriage, and Henrik's 19 year-old daughter, Karin (Julia
Dufvenius), become the focus of attention, and Bergman's
final representation of generational conflict. Henrik's
wife Anna has been dead for several years, and her absence
forces Henrik to cling desperately to Karin, not only
his daughter but his talented cello pupil. When Karin
is given the opportunity to study at a German conservatory,
Henrik's dependence comes into question. In a crucial
scene, Karin reads a recently discovered letter Anna
wrote to Henrik, warning him of forming an unhealthy
attachment to his daughter as a replacement wife. As
Saraband progresses and Henrik's sanity becomes undermined,
Bergman presents his thesis gradually and insidiously:
one person's freedom is another person's crippling loss.
Along the way, each sectional duet adds another layer
to the skeleton of the drama. While Marianne takes on
a maternal role in gently listening to and guiding Karin,
Johan's relationship to his son is revealed as a bitter,
Oedipal conflict. Bergman traces the development of
their feud over Anna (Josephson conveys the sick jealousy
Johan feels toward Henrik so perfectly that his sour
facial expressions-emphasized by trademark Bergman close-ups-are
almost painful to watch) to the fetishistic, incestual
obsession Henrik harbors for Karin. Bergman brings the
sexual tension to a boiling point so subtly and dryly
that the climactic confrontation between father and
daughter is not only genuinely startling but unnerving.
While it's impossible not to compare several scenes
unfavorably to similar, classic ones in the Bergman
canon-the direct address to the camera (Hour of the
Wolf), the church scene (Winter Light), the
uncanny outdoor excursion (Virgin Spring)-the
showdowns in spare, haunted interiors display the director's
consistent strength, and they hearken back to Bergman's
mastery of domestic space in Scenes from a Marriage,
where love dwelled but slowly suffocated. Equally remarkable
is how well Bergman's eye for austere color compositions
has adapted to the world of digital video, which, while
not as vivid as celluloid, adds a dreaminess all its
own in terms of grain and texture.
As for Johan and Marianne: while they often function
as characters peripheral to the central drama, the conflict
between Henrik and Karin places into relief their unresolved
questions concerning love, which Bergman addresses at
the beginning and end of the film. Johan remains profoundly
disillusioned, hardened by his jealousy and regrets
but nonetheless still needing solace. Marianne-always
searching, always open despite her stubbornness-provides
it for him, and her return confirms that her independence
and lightness both comfort and torture those made of
lesser stuff. The final scene between the former partners-two
admitted “emotional illiterates”-undressing and cuddling
together in a small bed is an image of tenderness and
mortality only Bergman could have conceived.
At the end of Scenes from a Marriage Johan states
that he and Marianne share an “earthly and imperfect”
love, one that suggests something achievable and human
in the face of enormous romantic expectations. What
has Bergman learned in the intervening years to addend
to this in Saraband? Anna, shown only in a ghostly
photograph, puzzles Marianne with the pure love she
had for those close to her-most of all Karin, for whom
she sought freedom and innocence. In the epilogue Marianne
tells us she finally understood this selflessness when
visiting her dying, catatonic daughter in the hospital-the
last scene shows Marianne touching her, on the face,
for the first time in her life. During the question
and answer session following Saraband's screening
at the New York Film Festival, Liv Ullmann suggested
that this final scene parallels Persona, in which
she played an actress withdrawing from the world through
silence, unable to connect with the nurse assigned to
care for her. Only the mysterious little boy, a character
remaining outside the story proper, attempts to make
physical contact in Persona, but with a picture
of Ullmann projected on a screen. The parallel describes
the tentative existential step Bergman has made in the
intervening 40 years between these two films, as well
as between Scenes and Saraband: from his
characters' emotional incertitude and physical coldness
to their burgeoning acceptance of redemption through
personal connection. Humankind being what it is, Bergman
is generous to offer us even this cautious hope. |
|
|