 |
|
Driven
to Distraction
By Nick Pinkerton
Keane
Lodge Kerrigan, U.S., Magnolia Pictures
Kerrigan’s Keane
begins unceremoniously, shoving the uninitiated viewer
into a tight, grubby scenario. The film tracks an obviously
emotionally disturbed man, William Keane (British actor
Damian Lewis, who, I’m told, appeared in Band of Brothers),
through New York’s Port Authority Bus Terminal, where
his daughter may or may not have been kidnapped—the
narrative remains noncommittal—a year prior. And, if
nothing else, New York City native Kerrigan’s movie
deserves credit as a contemporary NYC film that completely
eschews the metropolis’ big, obvious scenic effects.
The director opts for claustrophobic closeness over
panorama; the topography of New York and North Bergen,
Jersey indistinguishably smutch together in this film’s
drear world, forming one continuous catacomb of exposed
beams and naked brick, service-entrances and public
restrooms, bulletproof glass and wet underpasses.
In the Port Authority scenes, as for much of the film,
Kerrigan keeps his camera perched, Dardennes-style,
on our protagonist’s shoulder, swaying with his steps
and latched onto his bland, pink face. From these huddled
close-ups our p.o.v. pans and veers in concert with
Keane’s attention; it’s an attempt to find the visual
equivalent of the nauseatingly close, crisp foley work
of Kerrigan’s Clean, Shaven: subjective cinematic
psychosis. Shots break from Keane and his huffed, self-absorbed
monologues only to hang on meaningless, red herring
details—a clock reading ‘4:26,’ perhaps—which he turns
over and over with the intent scrutiny of a nonsense
detective, striving to extract inscrutable meanings
from his trail of non-clues.
This fractious whodunit material, and the extended bender
that punctuates it, is rough, rigorous stuff, and it
works on its own small-scale terms. But the cracks really
start to appear in the film’s latter half, which shifts
focus to Keane’s tentative interactions—tics staunchly
held in check—with a wan, hard-up mother (Amy Ryan)
who haunts the Jersey motel where he’s staying, and
the strange paternal relationship that he develops with
her daughter, Kira (Abigail Breslin), a pale, bloodless
little thing with a high, luminous forehead. The trio’s
soft scenes of makeshift family can’t, in and of themselves,
be accused of more than badly overreaching for shabby-sad
beauty and nocturnal solemnity, though a scene where
Lewis and Ryan slow dance like awkward 7th graders probably
deserves an incredulous snort. What’s more off-putting
is the tension that Kerrigan gradually escalates with
the development of these relationships and what this
tension effectively reduces Keane’s already under-drawn
character to: an accident waiting to happen.
In spite of the camera’s near-constant proximity to
Lewis, keeping the film ostensibly in first-person singular
mode, the movie’s attitude toward its protagonist’s
mental state strikes me as pretty unsophisticated and
hands-off. Keane’s schizophrenia is used as a force
of sustained suspense, and the uncertainty of his capacity
for violence—specifically toward the little girl—is
kept luridly dangling over the audience. We see Keane
muttering conspiracies down his sleeves, randomly lunging
at a stranger in the street, and then tenderly attending
to Kira’s bath, which leaves us only to guess as to
when the proverbial other shoe will drop. I’m sure a
pretty good argument could be formed that all of this
is intended to call into question the viewer’s own attitudes
and discomforts with the mentally ill, but I would still
insist that it’s a pretty crude device to build a movie
around, and it implies a totally wrongheaded attitude
toward Keane’s character. Despite its grimy realist
trappings, such callow thriller tropes place Keane in
“problem” picture territory—with the character’s condition
as an unsolved puzzle—rather than providing the fully-realized,
empathetic character study which the title suggests.
The “Will he?” and “When?” sources of suspense here
aren’t far from the hanging “Did he?” that looms across
Clean, Shaven, and Keane’s faults were
great enough to reveal new, basic weaknesses in Kerrigan’s
first feature which were overwhelmed by that film’s
detail-oriented proficiency and the astonishing emergence
of Peter Greene.
All that stayed with me after Keane was an unhappy
impression of all-abiding tonal uniformity in the hush-tone
vespers of dialogues, unhandsome, shallow mise-en-scčne,
and rigidly adhered-to aesthetic tenets. This extends
to Keane’s character, though Lewis, whose face suggests
a slightly de-evolved Greg Kinnear, does deserve some
credit for sheer chutzpah; Kerrigan and Lewis’s willingness
to keep a scene playing long after considerations of
pacing and comfort would demand that it should end results
in some of the movie’s few real frissons. The
best example of this is Keane’s spluttered jukebox sing-along,
which hangs on the screen just long enough to travel
from embarrassing to engaging to boring and back around
to engaging again. But if Lewis’s much-touted performance
is committed, unself-conscious stuff, it’s also everything
you’ve come to expect from a schizo star turn. One never
doubts the actor’s devotion; trenches of worry are dug
into his face, and his dry crying jags are more unsettling
than histrionic. But for all that workmanship, there’s
something absent; Keane is never articulated as more
than a sadness or a sickness, and what’s sorely missing
in this focused performance is an element of the unexpected.
I was aching to see Lewis play something other than
harried, to just allow himself the pointless indulgence
of a sudden idiot grin or a nonsense joke, to vacillate
even for a moment from the film’s chartered course of
quiet and gray. He doesn’t, and the result is one of
the tidiest movies about madness I’ve ever seen; much
as it pains me to admit this, Harmony Korine’s julien
donkey-boy, that swaying junk heap of tossed-together
scenes, seems like a truer, chancier film and—oh, irony
of ironies—Leo “Titanic” DiCaprio’s work in the
bloated holiday-season Oscar-juggernaut The Aviator,
despite being saddled with Psych 101 motivations, is
a lot more complex and human than anything in either
of these indie darlings.
Therein lies the problem; Kerrigan has been praised—as
he was at this most recent NYFF—as a true independent,
in the Sixties NYC sense of the word, before Fox Searchlight
and the Edward Burns filmography neutralized any significance
that the term might’ve once held. And reading up on
Kerrigan, I found it difficult not to respect his ethos:
Keane was shot on the fly, for under a million
bucks, and all of this out of the still-smoldering debris
of a catastrophic, aborted 2002 project, In God’s
Hands. So I feel a little guilty for not liking
his movie more. But grading Keane on such terms
seems, at best, a specious critical paradigm; I have
to think back to my teen-punk days, when I would try
to convince myself that some hardcore band’s murky EP,
replete with a xeroxed cover culled from an art school
drop-out’s portfolio, was—by virtue of the group’s being
signed to Skullfukk Records—somehow better or more daring
than Steely Dan.
That said, I feel like a postscript addressed to the
film world’s Darren Aronofskys is due, though I’m sure
they’re too busy tackling slopes of Colombian marching
powder bought with Warner Brothers’ cash to check out
no-name Young Turk film journals. It is true that American
independent film desperately needs more directors like
Kerrigan, willing to grapple tough, uninviting material
in tough, unwelcoming ways; filmmakers who will approach
their medium and their marginality as a means towards
something other than Sundance calling cards, made only
in the hopes of one day being able to huff major studio
dong. But I’m afraid what the indies don’t need is more
movies like Keane. |