Linklater
Symposium
Introduction
Richard
Linklater Interview
-Before
Sunset
1. Old Haunts
2. Mortal Beloved
3. A Confused Love Letter
4. Things to Come
-Slacker
-School of Rock
-Waking Life
-Dazed and Confused
1. That Old Feeling
2. Rock and Roll All Night
-SubUrbia
-It's Impossible to Learn to
Plow by Reading Books
-Live From Shiva's
Dance Floor
-The Newton Boys
-Before Sunrise
-Tape
Exclusive Features
Christopher Doyle Interview
-Hero
Thom Andersen Interview
-Los Angeles Plays Itself
New Releases
-Godzilla
-Maria Full of Grace
-Josh Marston correspondence
-The Terminal
-Super Size Me
-Coffee and Cigarettes
-Son Frère
-The Day After Tomorrow
-Zatoichi
-The Stepford Wives
-Spiderman 2
-Troy
DVD
-Floating
Weeds
about us
links
issue archive
contact us
mailing list
advertising
|
 |
 |
    |
|
Tracts
of My Tears
Joanne Nucho on SubUrbia
To the faded strains
of Gene Pitney’s “Town Without Pity,” we see a montage
of comparably dreary suburban landscapes. Strip malls,
rock quarries, and gated communities in which all the
rapidly erected houses look identically flimsy, all
melt together in a sea of dry, brownish grey. The horizon
is gutted, void, and empty in that way that makes it
somehow more depressing than any apocalyptic big city
sprawl. The opening shots of SubUrbia comprise
what is surely the ugliest opening montage of any Linklater
film thus far. Rather than setting the scene for a film
about the suffocations of small town life (as the opening
song suggests), the images reflect the emptiness, the
void, the lack of any viable opposition to what passes
for life in most American towns. Linklater asks in this
adaptation of Eric Bogosian’s 1997 play: What could
one hope for when every modern convenience, every need
is met? Does one have the right to desire beauty or
mystery when life is so “comfortable”?
In some ways, SubUrbia is a typical Linklater
film. Taking place over the course of one night and
revolving around a tight-knit group of young friends
somewhere in anytown suburban America (in this case,
the aptly named Burnfield), the film is in many ways
the darker sequel to Dazed and Confused. In both
films, the decade is more than just a backdrop—it’s
the central character. Dazed and Confused was
a portrait of a more homogenized small town in which
the cultural codes were more concrete and the roles
one was expected to play were more clearly defined.
And their hope for the future, their unbridled hedonism,
made them perhaps a little more innocent than the characters
in SubUrbia. The joie de vivre of the
characters in the earlier film reflects a radical difference
in landscape; the teens have full reign over their town,
and for one night, they are permitted to “own” their
community space. The suburbia of the Seventies doesn’t
yet seem so controlled by corporate branding.
Nostalgia is void in SubUrbia. The kids in SubUrbiaare
on the brink of adulthood—they graduated from high school
a year before this film is supposed to take place, but
are still trapped in their town. Unlike Dazed and
Confused, SubUrbiais a film about waiting,
about hanging around and the slow dissolution of hope
that something exciting is on the horizon. This isn’t
a film about crushed dreams, it’s really more about
the poverty of the dreams available—every possibility
seems unappealing, so the characters are in a kind of
stasis. This, one of Linklater’s bleakest films, is
very much a product of its time, and one that carries
an ultimate foreboding.
The America of SubUrbia is insular, separate
from the rest of the world and wallowing in self-pity.
And the ennui of suburbia has not changed: the 7-11
is still usually the only “public” space in town at
which kids can hang out, the big box Wal-Marts and McDonalds
still cannibalize the horizon. Linklater’s filmic representation
of this play makes ugliness the main character. The
kids in the film seem to take issue with the lack of
control they have other their neighborhood. They wander
through a world of invisible authority figures who shape
their landscape without asking them what they think
of it all—a Peanuts comic scripted by Beckett.
SubUrbia assembles its cast in the usual Linklater
way—there is no one clear protagonist, though the hopeless
and self-conscious musings of Jeff (played by Giovanni
Ribisi) make him the most empathetic character in this
suburban hell. Jeff’s girlfriend Sooze (Amie Carey),
the dilettante feminist performance artist, and friends
Bee-Bee (Dina Spybey), a recovering alcoholic, Tim (Nicky
Katt), a violent and bitter ex-soldier, and Buff (Steve
Zahn), a hedonistic buffoon, are the group of regulars
who loiter outside of the local convenience store (much
to the chagrin of Pakistani owners Nazeer [Ajay Naidu]
and Pakeesa [Samia Shoaib]). It starts out as just another
night in Burnfield, hanging out, drinking beer and talking
about nothing. No one suspects anything eventful will
happen, until Bee-Bee shows up and forces Jeff to admit
that their old friend Pony, who left Burnfield to become
a rock star, is going to meet them at ‘the corner’ sometime
that evening. The group’s immediate reaction to this
news suggests that the stillness around them is about
to be disturbed.
Much of the beginning
of the film is spent waiting for Pony to arrive. As
Jeff continues to pace nervously around the perimeter
of the convenience store, we begin to see a wisp of
a dramatic narrative unfold. This is what Linklater
does best—show that life happens while one is waiting
for something. Tim makes wisecracks at everyone else’s
expense and broods in the corner, drinking vast amounts
of beer. Buff humps walls and cars, picks his nose and
flails around like a child with ADD. Bee-Bee sits in
the corner watching everyone shyly, a perpetual silent
audience. Pent-up anxiety comes out in a foreboding,
violent burst as Tim and Buff challenge and harass nervous
shop-owner Nazeer to the point where his wife Pakeesa
pulls a handgun on them. Nazeer talks his wife down,
pulling her back into the store as the kids run away
jeering. Only Jeff has any semblance of a conscience,
attempting an ineffectual apology as he shirks away,
ashamed of his friends’ behavior.
While Jeff sees no viable alternative, no original action
or choice available to him, Sooze uses a passé expression
for her inexplicable angst. Her clichéd feminist performance
art, which consists mainly of a series of awkward gyrations
and tap dancing steps set to chantings like “fuck all
the men,” is emblematic of the “riot grrrl” archetype
of the early to mid-Nineties. Undoubtedly unaware that
this purposely misspelled term was used to publicize
pop groups like the Spice Girls, Sooze becomes a copy
of a copy of a copy of the self-labeled youth feminist
movement that is remembered mostly by its punk-rock
associations (it tended to focus on music and handmade
fanzines), a thoroughly grass roots, fragmented movement,
made up mostly of middle-class, white suburban teenage
and college-age girls, and not a centralized organization.
A lot of this art was clichéd and—how to put this lightly—bad,
expressions completely disassociated from their speakers’
own voices. When Bikini Kill’s Kathleen Hanna got up
on stage with “slut” written across her bare mid-riff,
looking to usurp and reclaim the words used to chastise
women noncompliant to societal standards, she unwittingly
gave birth to an entire generation of girls unable to
invent their own expressions of self-worth and who merely
gave in to slovenly imitation.
|
 |
|
Jeff is put off by her performance, and not just because
he is offended by her saying “fuck all the men” whilst
humping the air. He acknowledges her performance as
a cartoon of feminism, a generic message that she doesn’t
really understand. Sooze’s performance is recycled feminism,
co-opted and decontextualized, a spectacular
form that turns her into a caricature of a ‘strong woman’…more
Tank Girl than Simone de Beauvoir. When he questions
the meaning of her art, Sooze cannot respond. She runs
down a list of -isms that she seeks to confront (racism,
sexism, classism…) without really understanding how
or why, or even being able to connect them specifically
to what she does and the life she leads. Hilariously,
Jeff asks her, “Do you even know one black person?”
When Pony (Jayce Bartok) finally arrives in a ridiculous
black stretch limo, everyone is thoroughly anxious to
see him—Tim is armed with insults he is just waiting
to hurl, Buff is completely over-excited (as usual),
Bee-Bee hangs out in the background, and Jeff sulks
as he watches Sooze douse Pony with flattery. As the
characters start to mix, strange combinations collide
and pair off, pulling the group in opposite directions.
Bee-Bee watches on in horror as Buff (whom she had just
“gone to the van” with) makes some predictably sleazy
comments to Erica, Pony’s cell-phone wielding assistant
(reliably chirpy-bitchy Parker Posey). Sooze sits cross-legged
at Pony’s feet adoringly listening to one embarrassingly
“earnest” acoustic song after another.
Boiling point is reached when Pony performs “The Invisible
Man,” a ballad about dedicated to the “common people”
of Burnfield. Jeff finally explodes in anger, calling
Pony on his arrogance and insisting there is no difference
between someone “commenting on life” and selling his
comments to millions of consumers than someone like
him living in a tent in his parents’ garage. Sooze and
Pony do not agree, and from this point on there is a
major shift of loyalties. Jeff may not see the difference
between being a “loser” and being a “rock star,” but
Sooze certainly does.
After getting fed up with Sooze’s shameless hero worship,
Jeff comes to the conclusion that he isn’t really jealous
of Pony. After all, his life is just another kind of
routine, another compartment of the huge machine trapping
them in their individual cells. Pony may occupy a slightly
more opulent cell, but his limo is just as dull as Jeff’s
pup tent. Perhaps in another time, Jeff’s observations
may have been dismissed as sour grapes (which Bee-Bee,
in fact, does). In the mid-Nineties, though, this backlash
against the rock star image was prevalent enough to
be eventually turned into a marketing tool used to ‘shift
units’ to the very same alienated youth who fancied
themselves part of the backlash in the first place.
The marketing machine devours all in its path, and at
some level, Jeff is the only one who somewhat understands
this. There is no hope of an original action when everything
is so easily co-opted, when every gesture can be used
against you. This is the inescapability of American
culture, of the suburbs themselves. Here, the group
fragments into those who ecstatically embrace the stretch
limo and its implied one-way ticket to L.A. and those
who stay behind in Burnfield, either too cynical or
too afraid to leave. The film concludes with a surprising
climax—Bee-Bee, who has spent most of the film detached
from and silently observing her friends is found on
the roof of the convenience store, apparently overdosed
on a combination of alcohol and pills taken earlier
from her parents’ medicine cabinet. A horrified Nazeer
looks on shaking his head and shouting:
“What is wrong with you people? You are so stupid!
You have everything and you just throw it all away.”
Jeff looks up at him, unable to answer—this is the film’s
central question. Nazeer’s final assertion seems ridiculous
over the closing shots of the film: the sun rising over
the gas station, the tract homes, the strip malls of
Burnfield. Throwing all what away? Nazeer’s American
Dream seems unfeasibly utopian compared to the withered,
desiccated landscape that surrounds him. The white-picket
fence has since begun to tip over, shrugging with disgust.
The illusion of relative affluence has revealed itself;
the drab colors, the flatness of the horizon, the wasteland
of disused lots —this is the desert, a void, not some
attainable oasis.
One can easily be both disgusted by and empathetic towards
Jeff’s whining, because Burnfield really is a dump,
but for Jeff there is only talk, no actions, not even
daydreams of a better way of being. Jeff can’t even
express the disgust he feels for fear of lapsing into
clichés, into the realm of what has been done and said
before. The tent in his parents’ garage is his own chalk
outline—he’s no kind of hero. At best he’s a kind of
infantile disassociated Virgil leading us into the depths
of his own personal Inferno. And he can’t even do that
right—Jeff doesn’t claim to have the answers, to offer
any illumination. Without seeing any viable alternative,
original action or choice available to him, he remains
in stasis: he chooses to choose nothing.
In the end, as the group disperses, one cannot help
but feel like no matter where they go and what they
choose, they will still be wandering through neighborhoods
and cityscapes of someone else’s design. |
|
|