    |
|
Michael
Joshua Rowin on
The Village
Just as it’s possible
for viewers to like a film for the wrong reasons,
it’s also possible for viewers to hate a film
for the same. Thus, the case of The Village,
the most misunderstood, but also most justifiably
ridiculed, film of the year. M. Night Shyamalan
has built a career on his films’ surprise twist
endings, so that when The Village hit the
audience with its “secret,” it was a groaner of
such magnitude that it dwarfed more serious flaws.
Because let’s face it—as a political allegory
The Village is utterly useless. Shyamalan
compares America’s current fear of the Other,
the Muslim world, to that of children frightened
by manufactured bogeymen. Even if the Bush Administration
craftily uses fear to push its militarist policies—and
it does—the fact remains that terrorism is very
real. To deny it as an illusion is to deny an
increasingly extremist global reality. The project
becomes even more muddled when Shyamalan reveals
the aforementioned twist: the colonial American
setting is actually a sham designed to protect
a trauma support group’s children from the dangers
of the modern world. By conflating an imagined
colonial credulity of the past with a complex,
imperialist present, Shyamalan neglects the overwhelming
contradictions of contemporary politics (isn’t
at least part of the problem not that we’re scared
into ignorance, but that we know and still don’t
care?) at the expense of an admittedly stunning
moment of self-reflexivity for a mainstream Hollywood
film. Even so, why must an attempted political
statement be bedizening with such bells and whistles?
Audiences were disappointed by this denouement,
but that’s not the issue—Shyamalan’s reliance
on twists is nearly fetishistic, and his acquiescence
to an expected trademark betrays a troubling self-indulgence.
At least in Dogville von Trier had the
vision—and courage—to build everything up to strip
it down to the bare essentials of confrontation.
While I hate to turn to everybody’s favorite reference
point for The Village, there’s a reason
such things gain currency—Shyamalan’s failure
is ultimately a two-hour, beautifully shot episode
of The Twilight Zone. At least Rod Sterling’s
television series was progressive for its time.
The Village is worse than reactionary—its
vagueness, not universality, makes it completely
irrelevant.
More
on The Village
|