 |
 |
|
Apocalypse
Right Now
J. Holden M.S. White on Time of the
Wolf
What use do we have
for faith when the world has ended?
For Anne (Isabelle Huppert), the embattled protagonist
of Michael Haneke’s newest meditation on humankind’s
capacity for cruelty towards itself, God is absent from
the survival struggle into which she and her children
are thrust after the apocalypse comes and goes. Set
in an unspecified geography after an unexplained catastrophe,
Time of the Wolf is at once godless and pious,
its characters struggling outwardly for sustenance and
inwardly for answers. Haneke seems to ask: how quickly
after a disaster occurs does one begin to cope with
it spiritually? Is a spiritual quest worthwhile after
everything else has disintegrated? It’s a subtle theme
that runs through this less-than-subtle film, and one
central to current world events, in a time when our
collective fate lies in the hands of irresponsible world
leaders. In Haneke’s universe—one filled with depravity,
depression, and defeat—how readily do his characters
reach out for something else in the midst of all this?
Time of the Wolf opens much like the director’s
own Funny Games (97)—an SUV makes its way across
a remote road, while the family inside innocently assumes
their own security. In both films, the family is thrust
immediately into a waking nightmare, only the earlier
film pelts the audience with violence while this one
manifests its horror in scenes of pitch black night
and thick fog. Which scenario is more threatening? Watching
someone tie a pillowcase over your young son’s face,
or seeing vast acres of empty unpopulated land in utter
darkness stretching out before you? In both situations,
the viewer can infer the end of the world—in Funny
Games, the murderers’ ability to rewind time guarantees
that their slow, methodical killing spree will last
indefinitely. In Time of the Wolf, the inference
is obviously much more a part of the narrative, not
merely a conceptual twist. God does not make an appearance
in Funny Games, though the absence of prayers
during the worst scenes of torture seem to contradict
Wolf’s observations on faith in times of duress,
in which characters attempt to reconcile their earthly
and their heavenly concerns.
God is similarly absent
in the first half of Wolf, during which Anne
and her children (including the homeless boy they find
along the way) scrounge about for food and shelter.
Anne does not pray; the children appear not to have
been raised with religion, or, at least, Haneke is not
interested in showing us one way or another if they
had been. Spirituality, though, becomes a focal point
of the film’s latter half, when Bea (Brigitte Roüan)
one of the post-apocalyptic refugees taking shelter
in an abandoned train station with Anne speaks about
a group of demi-gods called The Just. Composed of 36
immortal men, the Just is the force that keeps the world
together—when one of the 36 is destroyed, the fabric
of the universe begins to unravel. Bea is calm amidst
the chaos around her, calmly puffing on a cigarette
during her monologue, with just a twinkle of far-away
desperation in her eyes.
|
    |
|
She’s not entirely convincing in her tranquilized fanatical
proselytizing though defeat is so deeply written across
her face that one can expect she’s living internally
after the catastrophe. Even more suspect is her claim
that Mr. Koslowski (Olivier Gourmet), the self-appointed
governor of this new society, is one of the Just. A
power-hungry despot, Koslowski engages in semi-consensual
sex with a number of the women in the train station,
offering them special protection and supplies in exchange
for their subjugation. Bea’s understanding of faith,
linked as it is to privilege and coercion is perverted.
Perhaps this is what faith becomes in a void—currency
for survival.
The other mention of a heavenly governing body in the
film comes from an old man, huddled in a small group
at night, oblivious to or nonplussed about the youngsters
in the room. He tells his rapt audience about a group
of men who sacrifice themselves in bonfires in order
to keep the world right. He blames the catastrophe,
essentially, on these Brothers of Fire failing to heed
their sacrificial call. This explanation hits young
Ben particularly hard, though we don’t realize it until
he’s climactically stripping his clothes off in front
of a giant fire, sparks flying outward and singeing
his skin. Ben is a character left predominantly alone
during the bulk of the film. In the beginning, we see
him bleeding profusely from the nose, a less obvious
stigmata which the director repeats throughout. This
all culminates in a scene as harrowing as it is unexpected.
Ben, probably 10 years old, reserved and polite, hesitantly
approaches the fire, which is well-contained but ragged
and burning bright. He throws in a couple of branches
to feed the flames before he begins determinedly peeling
off layers of clothes. It’s a desperate move, but, as
Haneke repeatedly shows us throughout the film, these
are the most desperate of times. Water sells for a high
premium, electricity is a memory, and a transistor radio
is the only contact to anyone else outside their temporary
(or possibly permanent) shelter.
For Haneke, in the post-world, faith is co-opted, hiding
inside desperation—a suspension of disbelief primarily
focused towards some sort of ending: “I have faith that
these shoes will not hurt my feet, for they are Nikes.”
“I have faith that there is something better at the
end of this.” “I have faith that there will be a God
to explain this and make it better.” The fact that Haneke’s
vision takes place practically immediately after the
world ends—Anne at one point mentions that she and her
children had been on the road for just a few days—might
make this spiritual emptiness more easily understood.
There’s a level of shellshock among Haneke’s characters,
manifested in resigned silence or unexplained anger,
that seems to have cast a shadow over their capacity
for faith or religion. Perhaps with the emergence of
a new society, spirituality will be more relevant. Religion
has devolved into mythology, desperate and flailing.
But these are Haneke’s storytellers, these mythologists.
Religion is founded upon the oral tradition, the passing
down of myths and fact and apocrypha until they cohere
into something with a central doctrine. Haneke is creating
a new society and, with it, a new religion. The world
is starting over, and humanity must find a new God.
|
|