2003 - year in review
Introduction

top ten
#10) Raising Victor Vargas
#9) Lord of the Rings
        The Return of the King

#8) Elephant
#7) Irreversible
#6) demonlover
#5) Spellbound
#4) The Son
#3) Mystic River
#2) Lost In Translation
#1) Kill Bill

individual top tens

but what about...
Bad Santa
City of God
City of God 2
Dog Days
Friday Night
Holes
Japon
Lilja 4 Ever
Open Range
Shattered Glass
Unknown Pleasures
Wrong Turn


get over it:
LOTR - The Return of the King
Monster
Mystic River


articles and reviews:
2 Cents - mini reviews
Hollywood's Year of Dad Rock
The Cinema of Joseph Cornell
Year of the Doc
Angels in America
Big Fish
The Dreamers
Kids Are Alright
My Architect
Pieces of April - redux

about us

links

issue archive


contact

  MYSTIC RIVER

By now, shouldn’t we all know better than to fall for movies like this? It’s a pretty simple equation: sturdy direction by a wow-doesn’t-he-look-great-for-his-age filmmaker (bonus points for doing your own score), solid if highly aware performances by a cast of revered actors, and literary source material all cast in an air of studied solemnity are the most basic ingredients for year-end Oscar stew, and each November we get another heaping serving. Clint’s particular variety gains points for its spot-on sense of locale and the best Kevin Bacon performance in recent memory (maybe ever—for me his resuscitation from country-rock mediocrity is the film’s highest virtue), but loses them quickly for grafting a rickety police thriller onto a character study marred with half-baked moral quandary and half-hearted religious symbolism. I don’t believe in the headier aspects of Mystic River any more than I do his other multiple Academy Award winner Unforgiven (is it too early to crown Mystic ?). Both films are so intent on convincing audiences of how deadly serious and important they are that they end up as inert as their creator’s visage. Not to mention that the shades of grey morality they proffer up always seem to end up bleeding back into an uncomfortable black and white. I like Clint better when he loosens up and gets a little weird—A Perfect World, or the ridiculous, yet somehow charming sex ‘n’ jazz montage in Play Misty For Me are both the work of a filmmaker enjoying the process, rather than just trudging grimly through the usual bases. It’s perhaps that sense that most hamstrings Mystic River—we’ve been here before, and seen it all. What’s so special about this version? By the time Clint’s flown us for the umpteenth time over the Mystic in his rented helicopter, he’s managed to foster an odd sense of déjà vu for his own film. Oh wait, I bet that’s supposed to be the kind of visual rhyming that serious filmmakers employ to make a point. I must have just missed it. Mystic River is not a “bad” movie by any means, but when did our standards drop so low that “solid” could be so easily confused with “masterpiece”?
—JR




reverse shot is a bi-monthly, independently published film journal
Join our mailing list and be the first to know about any updates or news. Email us at mailinglist@reverseshot.com
Like what's here and interested in writing for us? Send submissions and queries to info@reverseshot.com

year in review  |  but what about | get over it  |  articles & reviews  |  about us  |  links  |  archive  |  contact

All Original Content Copyright © 2003 Reverse Shot - All Rights Reserved