2003 - year in review
Introduction

top ten
#10) Raising Victor Vargas
#9) Lord of the Rings
        The Return of the King

#8) Elephant
#7) Irreversible
#6) demonlover
#5) Spellbound
#4) The Son
#3) Mystic River
#2) Lost In Translation
#1) Kill Bill

individual top tens

but what about...
Bad Santa
City of God
City of God 2
Dog Days
Friday Night
Holes
Japon
Lilja 4 Ever
Open Range
Shattered Glass
Unknown Pleasures
Wrong Turn


get over it:
LOTR - The Return of the King
Monster
Mystic River


articles and reviews:
2 Cents - mini reviews
Hollywood's Year of Dad Rock
The Cinema of Joseph Cornell
Year of the Doc
Angels in America
Big Fish
The Dreamers
Kids Are Alright
My Architect
Pieces of April - redux

about us

links

issue archive


contact

  FRIDAY NIGHT

For the audience enamored of Claire Denis’s polarizing lover letter to a medium she so gracefully commands, there simply wasn’t another film in 2003 on par with this piece of entrancing, visceral cinema. A poised panegyric in electric images born of the senses, Denis and dp Agnes Godard weave a sinuous, dreamy consideration of a one night stand replete with the unspoken punctuation this is human chemistry. It’s a film that measures the weight of a calm hand on a nervous one, the size of a fleeting glance, a gentle touch and its role amidst the imponderable power plays of sexual vulnerability. Conversations are curt, silences are profoundly pregnant, and the resulting cinema is of the finest variety: elegant, restrained, nearly pure.

But there were those who fell for Friday Night and those who fell asleep. For many, the film seemed little more than a stylish glorification of a tryst. The pared-to-the-bone narrative received its share of critical calumny, but frankly, Denis chose unlikable subject matter. Further entrenching the film in self-imposed misfortune, Friday Night’s profundities seem less suited to intellectual appropriation than to some subliminal emotional recognition; even if you respond to the film, it’s tough to gauge why and even harder to write about. Suffice it to say that hers is a movie meant to be felt, not watched, for dreamers rather than voyeurs. And though the onscreen romance drives the narrative, the real love affair is strangely cinephilic: between a filmmaker, her audience, and those glorious images that connect the two just above the belt.
—MATTHEW PLOUFFE




reverse shot is a bi-monthly, independently published film journal
Join our mailing list and be the first to know about any updates or news. Email us at mailinglist@reverseshot.com
Like what's here and interested in writing for us? Send submissions and queries to info@reverseshot.com

year in review  |  but what about | get over it  |  articles & reviews  |  about us  |  links  |  archive  |  contact

All Original Content Copyright © 2003 Reverse Shot - All Rights Reserved