 |
|
Vincent
& Theo
Dir. Robert Altman, (1990), U.K./France/U.S.
MGM, $14.94 Robert
Altman has often likened his working methods to
that of a painter’s, the process coming off the
cuff, from the gut, purely unconscious. But he’s
had an artisan’s vocational upbringing into the
movie business—only after years of crap jobs like
selling insurance did he eventually learn his
trade at the Calvin Company in Kansas City, makers
of how-to and industrial films; and only after
he plied it in a couple of feature obscurities
(The James Dean Story, The Delinquents;
both 1957) and about a hard decade in the mercenary
grind of television, in which he was dependent
on the fickle la-di-da benevolence of producers,
sponsors, and ratings, did Altman’s filmic voice
emerge through Countdown, That Cold
Day in the Park and, finally, M*A*S*H.
It stands to reason, then, that he was not blessed
with a fully-formed and focused Artist’s emergence
out of the womb: he discovered—maybe stumbled
ass-backwards over—his talent, and he sharpened
it. No surprise that hokey mysticism like the
Born Artiste, exalted above the peons, has zero
call in Altman’s Democracy: his sense of that
myth (or withering cynicism towards) demands that,
say, Willie Hart’s visionary paintings in 3
Women be done in a pool at an apartment complex
in Cow’s Ass, CA, and not hung on a wall in the
Met; or that Tom Frank’s performance of his song
“I’m Easy” in Nashville is less some kind
of grandiose exaltation than one man’s simple
groveling to get laid.
“I am a workman,” Vincent van Gogh (Tim Roth,
some of Made in Britain‘s skinhead still
in him) says in Vincent & Theo, “I am a
painter.” This is Altman’s ground-level take on
the man: Vincent may see God in Art, but the director
still damns him to finances. Following video footage
of a Van Gogh painting being auctioned at Christie’s
in London, the narrative opens on a scene between
Vincent and his brother Theo (Paul Rhys) in the
former’s impoverished flophouse as impulsive Vincent
makes the “Hey-what-the-hell?” decision to become
a painter, and art gallery employee Theo informs
his broke brother that he’s been floating his
bills. All the while Altman ruthlessly undercuts
this exchange by carrying over the banter of the
auction underneath the dialogue, the irony getting
pumped up as the bidding gets higher, putting
the newfound artist’s life in a hardscrabble context.
Here, without the romance of history, Vincent
is merely a painter, “not bad” according to peer
Paul Gauguin (Wladimir Yordanoff), and only a
paid painter in that he gives his brother his
work—which Theo peddles at the gallery and can’t
sell—in exchange for his allowance. Any “genius”
that exists does so only in the form of the amplified
colors on his canvases, which Altman, cinematographer
Jean Lépine, and production designer/progeny Stephen
Altman, do well to not replicate cinematically.
Even a usual abstainer of cliché like Altman can’t
resist imbibing in some of the ol’ irresistible
“tortured artist” shtick: the framing and posture
of Vincent lying on his bed in the first scene,
saying he wants to be a painter, is strikingly
duplicated later when Vincent lies in a bath at
an asylum while a doctor haphazardly diagnoses
him as basically loony (chronic case of lust for
life, apparently).Vincent paints, drinks, paints,
takes, paints, self-mutilates, paints, and finally
dies by his own hand, paintings unsold, and with
little true meaning to anyone except his brother.
And maybe it’s Theo, as the brothers’ headstones
are framed together at the end, who emerges as
the figure of greater tragedy—hobbled by syphilis
and guilt, he had the desire to be his own man
but toiled as an underling at a gallery where
he didn’t even make a married man’s wage. He loved
Vincent as Vincent took from him cheerfully; until
finally Theo willed himself into the sort of emotional
isolation that Vincent was cursed/born with, voluntarily
excluding himself from his wife and son; and still
he loved Vincent and was finally alone with him
a year after his brother’s death, following him
to the grave.
Given the parallels in Altman/van Gogh’s approach
to art, it’s tempting to read Vincent & Theo
as a smuggled Altman autobio: like Vincent (Tim
Roth), Altman dropped the church, although Vincent
traded Christianity for painting and Altman probably
just stopped giving a shit about Catholicism;
Vincent’s penchant for trashing his work is approved
by Altman in the featurette on the DVD, when he
tells Tim Roth that he loves to “destroy paintings”
(residue from his days in the slash ’n’ burn arena
of industrial and TV?); Vincent’s contentious
financial relationship with moneyman Theo could
stand for any number of similar relationships
feisty Altman’s had with agents, managers, producers,
or studio heads; and just as Vincent claims that
he can’t paint “from here” (pointing to his head),
so does Altman work more clearly when he’s not
coming from his own cranium (Images) but
rather when he reacts to—and allows himself to
be caught up in—the crowd (as in the likes of
California Split, Come Back to the Five
and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean, or The
Company).
But Altman is not Vincent, finally, or at least
cannot invest in him. He may track and film his
actors the way Vincent tracks and draws the prostitute
Sien (Jip Wijngaarden), he may pan and zoom through
a field of sunflowers in the manner of cunning
brushstrokes, but his earthbound populism paradoxically
demands an overlord’s omniscient view of the recycling
process of life and death, and it’s such that
Vincent’s bedridden death with Theo at his side
doesn’t even occur on camera—he’s alive, the camera
pans off him and follows Theo’s arm as he reaches
over and past him, the camera comes back with
the arm, to him, and he’s dead. He cannot grant
the artist, one man, a symbolic/metaphoric passing.
Ultimately what matters most to Altman is the
societal ebb and flow, and the aftereffects and
absorption of shock, and if Altman grieves for
Vincent, it’s because Theo does.
Vincent & Theo makes its Region One debut
courtesy of MGM and, like other MGM Altman releases
Fool for Love, The Long Goodbye, Images;
(where’s Thieves Like Us, fellas?), it
comes with a specially produced featurette, this
one called “Film as Fine Art,” running about 25
minutes and featuring new interviews with the
two Altmans, along with snippets of footage shot
on the set and bits of archival interviews with
Roth and Rhys. Kind of a misleading title, but
there’s a good amount of standard behind-the-scenes
info to be gleaned (about as much as there can
be from Altman, who tends to speak in generalized
philosophy when it comes to shop talk), such as
the project’s genesis as a miniseries for British
TV. The elder Altman speaks of footage shot and
then discarded as the miniseries morphed into
a feature—man, where’s that stuff—and a
not-idiotic trailer rounds out the disc.
—ANDY STARK |