 |
|
A
Greyer Shade of Pale
Omar Odeh on Dead Man Almost
everything about Dead Man jars with our
better instincts, leaving a first impression of
a film whose every aspect is in a state of disrepair.
The music is imprecise, repetitive, and grating.
The hero is dying. The story is unabashedly primitive
and fairy-tale-like; telegraphed names like the
Native American Nobody (Gary Farmer) or the frontier-town
of Machine sound off like explosions amidst a
proudly grotesque and decaying setting. The storytelling
is indifferent, refusing to explain things, like
the bounty hunters’ clockwork precision, or using
sham-coincidences to keep reuniting Blake (Johnny
Depp) and Nobody. Two hours later, however, the
nightmare logic of all these eccentricities has
become apparent. We’ve been re-oriented to the
film’s somber world, made ready, as it were, for
its pitiless and inescapable conclusion.
Or is it just that our eyes have finally adjusted
to the startling black-and-white photography?
A “broken” format for this broken film completing
the list of “limitations” that make for its terrible
cumulative impact. Compared with our everyday
visual experience, black-and-white is an incomplete
format offering us access to a seemingly partial
or unfinished reality. It’s one step closer to
a contour map than color film intensifying our
imagination; given the gap between everyday visual
experience and monochrome there’s an extra step
required to mentally process the imagery. The
detachment and abstraction—which numerous still
photographers working in the format have long
cherished—amplifies the power of Dead Man’s
grating first impression, accentuating our bewilderment.
Once we have made the adjustment however, an allusive
and telling nightmare emerges whose power is deeply
indebted to the gray scale palette.
Five of Jarmusch’s nine features have been shot
in black-and-white, marking a distinct commitment
to the format. Although it’s possible that for
his earliest films this was more by necessity
than design, as early as Down by Law (1986)
Jarmusch was at a point in his career when shooting
in black-and-white was a commercial liability.
In his DVD commentary to Down by Law Jarmusch
alludes to the difficulties of financing black-
and-white films; the lower anticipated returns
making them a riskier proposition for producers,
all else being equal. Only Jarmusch knows for
certain if his insistence was the result of stubbornness,
vanity, or careful aesthetic arithmetic but he
certainly wasn’t making his life any easier. Dead
Man holds a kind of privileged place amongst
the resulting films; it marked a return to the
format for Jarmusch after making two films in
colour and it is the last full feature of his
to be shot by Robby Müller.
Perhaps the two were acting for our own protection;
the less graphic nature of black-and-white providing
a type of built-in welder’s glass through which
to observe the slow eclipse of the accountant
by the poet and the intensification of violence
that it engenders in him. Blake’s killing of two
marshals, Lee and Marvin, serves as a tipping
point in this overall scheme, and it is around
this point that Dead Man begins to gel
for me. It is the first instance where Blake kills
with precision and agility. There is a palpable
resignation to his answering, “Yes. I am William
Blake. Do you know my poetry?” From this point
on, all bets are off, as Nobody’s initial quizzical
statement, about Blake’s gun replacing his tongue,
becomes prophecy, and the film’s nightmare rendition
of hell no longer feels labored but simply eerie
and tragic.
|
    |
|
Dead Man
was Jarmusch’s first foray into depicting violence
but this didn’t stop him from putting as much
of it onscreen as he could. The callousness and
savagery of his frontier setting and its inhabitants
knows no limits; the ruthlessness and barbarity
of the bounty hunter Cole Wilson (Lance Henriksen)
stands out as the most notorious but also the
most humorless example. The photography, buttressed
by watchful blocking and acting, invites careful
consideration of the calamity as opposed to tantalization.
The blood takes on an ink-like quality, utterly
unreal but perfectly resonating with Nobody’s
warnings. In a late scene Blake comes across a
dead fawn. It is a ghostly, pale gray while the
blood is almost black. He touches its wound, mixing
its blood in his own and then adding this to the
war paint on his face. The action—apparently improvised
by Johnny Depp—acknowledges Blake’s eponymous
status in merciless wordless clarity.
The strangeness of black-and-white plays perfect
accompaniment to the more mysterious workings
of Dead Man’s world. The film conjures
an awareness of the supernatural often through
decidedly lo-fi effects like superimpositions.
Nobody’s peyote-induced vision of Blake as a skeleton,
for instance, makes for a fragile image whose
appeal to our imagination is enhanced by the lack
of color. At one point Blake briefly sees what
appears to be a female Native American in face
paint. When he looks again however, there is only
a raccoon which scurries off into the bush. Jarmusch
handles the effect with simple straight cuts.
As seen through a range of grays in the dark the
camouflage effect of the woman against the bushes
and the resemblance of the face paint to a raccoon
are heightened. The ambiguity of the episode confirms
the very strange realm that inscribes this film—a
realm where it is entirely at our discretion whether
the woman transformed herself into a raccoon or
whether the episode is a phantasm of Blake’s.
One description of this world is offered by Nobody,
whose first incantation upon learning Blake’s
name is from Songs of Experience: “Some
are born to sweet delight/Some are born to endless
night.” In insisting on a narrow range of nocturnal
shades, Dead Man’s photography makes good
on Nobody’s ominous promise once again, giving
him the benefit of the doubt over Depp’s oblivious,
though well-intentioned, innocent. For all his
alienation, Gary Farmer’s tortured outcast is
surprisingly at home amidst the phantom workings
of the film’s frontier landscape, a strange and
scary place that is equal parts past and present.
The film stubbornly and successfully flaunts all
expectation—of the western, of real-world behavior
and of normal visual experience—requiring spectatorial
stunt work as exigent as it is rewarding. |