 |
 |
|
The
Last Western
Tom J. Carlisle on The Wild Bunch
“Mama, put my guns in the
ground, I can’t shoot them anymore”
I blame Bob Dylan. Several years ago I happened
upon his soundtrack for Sam Peckinpah’s Pat
Garrett & Billy the Kid (1973) in a used
CD bin, and, after confirming that it was an authentic
lost masterpiece, I, of course, had to see the
movie. Yet, it turned out that other than Dylan’s
music and his appearance in the film as the gnomic
Alias, there isn’t a hell of a lot to enjoyment
to be found in Pat Garrett. In fact, it
was one of the most deflating experiences I’ve
had in terms of failed hero worship in cinema.
And so my sorry excuse goes, I never got around
to seeing The Wild Bunch (1969). I just
didn’t see the point; after all, if Peckinpah
was responsible for such an outright failure as
the one I had to wipe my mind clean of just to
enjoy the album again, his supposed masterpiece
had to one of those overrated behemoths that dot
the auteurist landscape, right?
Well, now, after being sent shocked and stumbling
through The Wild Bunch for the first time,
and uttering incantations against my inclination
to prejudge for the hundredth odd time, I’ve come
to understand why the later film seemed so devoid
of purpose and energy. After The Wild Bunch
there simply wasn’t anyplace left for Peckinpah
to go with the Western genre. In fact, The
Wild Bunch upped the ante so high on what
we might call the classical revisionist Western
(before knee-jerk irony became de rigueur), that
it doesn’t seem possible that anyone could play
that particular game anymore. From that point
forward, the Western was forever in quotation
marks. Even Sergio Leone, the king of the first
wave of the genre’s re-imagining, who probably
thought he had the last word on his subject of
choice in the masterful Once Upon a Time in
the West (1968), seemed to understand that
The Wild Bunch brought everything as far
as it could possibly go—it was Woodstock and Altamont
all rolled into one. Case in point is Leone’s
next film (and his last six shooter epic), Duck,
You Sucker!, which, while looking like a Western,
pretty much abandons any and all convention and
goes straight for pure lysergic insanity coupled
with revolutionary (as in political) action. Sure,
Eastwood attempted to revive the genre in the
wonderfully nasty High Plains Drifter,
and again, almost successfully, in Unforgiven,
but in the end they just seem like seem like pale
retreads when compared to The Wild Bunch—so
much safer and less jarring, like the Thunder
Mountain Railroad at Disneyland versus the rickety
thrill of the Cyclone. Other than that it’s been
the McCabe & Mrs. Miller school of sly
subversion (see Dead Man) or the recent
move into expansive Jacobean revenge tragedies
with Deadwood. It’s a shame that Peckinpah’s
collaboration with Dylan hadn’t come together
a few years earlier than it did. “Knockin’ on
Heaven’s Door” would have been the perfect song
for The Wild Bunch to ride out into the
sunset on. Put those guns in the ground, indeed.
|
  |
|
What makes The
Wild Bunch so powerful is not merely its radically
revisionist qualities but that it stands so squarely
on the old tropes of the genre. Train robberies,
horse chases, gunfights, circling buzzards, reluctant
showdowns--—they’re all there but are shot through
with such energy and poeticism that they seem
both new and ultimately exhausting in their finality.
When a bridge is blown up in a chase sequence,
the men and horses don’t simply fall into the
river below; they burst forth from the water like
Poseidon’s chariot out of Greek myth. Each set
piece has an air of “you can’t top this, so don’t
even bother” about it. These moments form a solid
backbone for, yes, the wildness that carries on
all around them—rarely has a film been so aptly
titled. As the first 20 minutes barrel forward
with nary a pause, you are subsumed by a violent
insanity that even now seems shocking; prior to
the orgies of action we have grown accustomed,
it must have been downright apocalyptic. But beyond
this Peckinpah presents the audience with something
rarely, if ever seen anymore: genuinely homicidal
heroes and the extreme casualties that are a result
of the thrilling gunfights. After the first battle,
and again after the climactic “Battle of the Bloody
Porch,” the camera sticks around following the
fighting to linger on the dead bodies, the sheer
human waste of the gunplay. Innocents are slaughtered
in far greater number than combatants, and not
only does Peckinpah let us dwell on this carnage
when the shooting has stopped, even while the
melee is in full swing bullets burst through endless
townspeople that the Bunch use, both intentionally
and otherwise, as human shields. The first casualty
of the film is a timid clerk blasted into oblivion
by the bounty hunters lying in wait for the bandits
who, it turns out, are who we’re supposed to be
rooting for. Perhaps it is the sly joke of an
old drunk that many of those collaterally damaged
in the first battle are annoyingly pious teetotalers
marching for Temperance, but even here the humor
fades quickly and we are allowed to feel the human
cost of life pointlessly trampled down.
Actually, that’s about all we are allowed to feel,
other than shellshock. I’m not embarrassed to
admit that after Pike, the leader of the bunch
(played to perfection by William Holden), tells
his boys to kill the civilians if they move—yes,
they do move, yes, they are killed—and all hell
breaks loose, I had almost no idea what was going
on. It was all just explosions and the twisting
ballet of death. In the gunfights of The Wild
Bunch we have the precursors of both the confusing
and terrifying battles in the antiwar war films
to come, like Saving Private Ryan, and
the stunningly beautiful blood operas of John
Woo. (I haven’t heard him mention Peckinpah specifically
as an influence, but his trademark slow motion,
blood spurting, falling bodies shot from multiple
angles—both by bullets and film—turn out to be
quite a case of copyright infringement.)
Make no mistake, our protagonists remain bastards
from beginning to end. The climactic showdown
only occurs because the Bunch sell out one of
their own to begin with. Immediately before the
iconic, suicidal walk into the city to right their
wrong, not only do we find the scruffy Gorch brothers
refusing to pay a crying whore the two more pesos
she is owed but the ostensible noble leader shortchanging
his hooker while her baby cries on the floor.
Nobility be damned, yes, but somehow this uncomfortable
and embarrassing scene doesn’t undercut the power
of the next moment; when Pike says “Let’s go,”
and they begin their fatal march, I can honestly
say I had chills running up and down my spine.
This, then, is where the genius of The Wild
Bunch lies: in Peckinpah’s ability to juxtapose
so many seemingly contradictory elements without
letting the tale spin out of control, starting
with the basic fundamentals and adding layer upon
subversive layer without subverting the necessary
emotional muscle of the archetype. In The Wild
Bunch Peckinpah puts everything he possibly
can into the Western and ultimately leaves very
little for anyone else to do with the genre. |
|